Non Empirical ( Doctrinal) and Empirical Method
Non
Empirical ( Doctrinal) and Empirical Method:
Research
is a logical and systematic search for new and useful information on a
particular topic. What data is to be collected? Where data will be found? How
data will be collected and analysed?
The
method of procuring data for
research is an independent segment of research design. Existing data sources
cause confusion in data selection if
researchers do not posses basic knowledge of dealing with data at various
stages, each of which may raise questions of validity. Inaccurate data collection can impact the results of a study and
ultimately lead to invalid results. There are various facts, data and
information relating to research topic available in the world. Researcher is
required to make the proper objective, logical and authoritative decision that
what facts may be relevant for his study or not.
Basically
methods of data collection can be classified on following broad aspects as
1. Nature
of Research problem and Research objectives.
2. 2. Authority of Data
3. 3.
Reasoning followed in data collection.
On the basis
of above three considerations research methods of data collection applied in
legal research may be classified as
1.
Doctrinal and Empirical Method.
2. Primary and Secondary Data.
3. Inductive and Deductive Method
Non Empirical Doctrinal
Legal Research:
It can be defined as research into legal
doctrines through analysis of statutory
provisions and cases by the application of reasoning. The emphasis is upon
analysis of legal rules, principles, and
judicial precedents, Institutions like courts, police machinery, jails,
tribunals or doctrines.
It begins by taking up a proposition as a starting point or focus. He then
locates the law in statutes, judicial pronouncements, and discussions in
commentaries, textbooks, journals, and debates. Reads them in a holistic manner
analyze them and write his findings. For example, a research on proposition of
prevention against double jeopardy, under criminal law, would begin with
locating the law in constitution, and criminal law materials etc.
In doctrinal research ordinarily data is collected in Library and by directly attending Lectures, Conference, Seminar, Judicial, Legislative and Administrative proceedings and decisions, content analysis and case study. Sources of Information Technology and Mass communication have become prominent source of data collection within Doctrinal method.
Doctrine
is also used to refer to a principle of law, in the common law traditions, established through a history of past
decisions, or the principle of fair use. In every research basic object of
researcher is to find out the facts and after observation and analysis of facts
certain theory, propositions, philosophy
or principles are propounded. Doctrinal research is one step advance then non doctrinal method where fact is observed
in empirical social condition.
Doctrinal
research is possible only where relevant and sufficient information exists and
available on research topic and the information coming from credible source is assumed true.
Standard of credibility of source of information may be decided on the basis of
authority, experience, knowledge and other relevant considerations.
Basic
sources of data collection in doctrinal legal research are – ► Participation-
Direct attending (Physical presence) lecture, seminar, conference, observation
of judicial, legislative and administrative proceeding or their recording in
written or electronic format. ► Publications- Books, Journals, Reporters,
Magazines, News Papers, Juristic work, Reports of (Seminar, conferences,
symposiums, legislative, judicial and administrative proceedings), literature
containing factual & philosophical information. Articles, Research papers,
thesis or dissertations. Reports, judgments and commentaries and case laws.
Data
Processing:
Information
---Credible source------Relevant to Research Problem------No Scope of
Doubt-----Data Admissible
Empirical
Method:
Empirical
Method Empirical method is also known as Non-doctrinal method, is the source of
knowledge by data acquired, verifiable and provable by means of observation or experiment. Researcher
Doctrinal Method Information Credible
Source Relevant to Research Problem No Scope of Doubt Data Admissible relies on
his own experience with facts and variables in real social condition. Empirical
data is more authoritative for research over doctrinal data. The non-doctrinal
research is relationship of law with society, groups and people. It involves an
empirical inquiry into the operation of
law. Researcher has to undergo with hard
work of finding sources, places, and situation so that he can observe the
relevant facts. Research output is solely is depending on skill and quality of researcher or investigator. Empirical data
collection is made by the researcher or investigator through his own observational and analytical skills.
Empirical method is usually preferred with new
research problems, where no possibility
of acquire data through doctrinal method. Social problems not dealt by
earlier researchers, no other doctrinal material is available on such problem
in that case researcher has only option of empirical research. Sometimes, past theories, suggestions or assumptions
become defective or insignificant
due to changing social, environmental factors and modern technologies.
Therefore, necessity arises to fresh look into the matter by investigation and
observation of real social phenomenon and after keen and skilled analysis new theory should be propounded so that
the social problem can be solved purposively.
Techniques commonly
used for empirical data collection are Observation, Interview, and Survey and
case study. Empirical method is a factual investigation and philosophical
conclusion where facts are observed,
analyzed, realized and after due satisfaction accepted and processed in
research for a valid conclusion.
Data
Processing:
Observation
of Fact --- Analysis----Realisation----Satisfaction---- Acceptance of Data.
Primary and Secondary Data
Authoritative source:
In legal research process there are various sources available for obtaining
data. But wattages of information depend on the nature of source of
information. If, requisite data is obtained from the authoritative source it
has wattage rather than information coming from non authoritative sources. On
this basis research data can be classified into primary data and secondary
data. In other words the data which is collected for the first time by direct observation is called primary data, and
the data which is collected from existing
records, publications, etc., is known as secondary data.
In
doctrinal legal research basic authoritative sources of development in field of
law are considered primary source as1. Legislative enactments 2. Judicial
decisions 3. Customs Above three are the most authoritative sources of legal
data. Legal data from all other sources are non authoritative or least authoritative in relation to
other authoritative source is secondary. The law emanating directly from the
competent authority is termed as authoritative source. Authoritative sources
are binding in force. In present time legislation and judicial precedents are
the foremost primary sources of law.
So far as custom is concerned, it may or may not be the primary source of law
depending on its status.
Secondary
Data – Any such information in relation to which no primary source is available, but information is available with
other non authoritative sources i.e., secondary sources. Consequently,
information is to be obtained from secondary source only. Admissibility of data
from secondary source is assumed on their reliability only. The Commentaries,
digests, books, encyclopedias and thesis are regarded as the secondary sources
of law. Secondary sources of law are admissible only as persuasive force.
Comments
Post a Comment